Prostate Imaging Modalities: A Review of Current Practices and Future Directions

Main Article Content

Muffrih Mohamad Haresi, Yahya Ali Mohammed Hakami, Wael Mohammed Hassan Mujarribi, Muath Abdullah Abdurahman Alzeer, Mohammad Abdrabalhabeeb Salm Lahmadi, Mohammed Abdullah Abdulrahman Alzeer, Hussain Ahmad Ibrahim Moashy, Adeeb Ahmed Sayed, Abdullah Fahad Alhabshan, Ahmed Ali Ahmed Humedi, Khalid Ahmed Essa Khormi, Abdulaziz Hussain Saeed, Tarek Hussein Binmarwan, Ziad Meshal Naif Otaibi, Naif Abdulmajeed Ali Refaei

Abstract

Background: The prostate gland plays an essential role in male reproductive health, producing fluid that contributes to semen. However, prostate conditions, including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis, and prostate cancer, are common, especially in aging men. Imaging techniques are crucial in diagnosing, staging, and monitoring these conditions. Various modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, and their advanced applications, such as multiparametric MRI, provide detailed insights into prostate pathology. These modalities are invaluable for diagnosing prostate malignancies, assessing local extension, and guiding biopsies.


Aim: This review examines the role of current imaging modalities in evaluating prostate conditions, with a particular focus on the advances in MRI technology, including multiparametric imaging, and their potential for improving diagnostic accuracy. It also discusses the contributions of other modalities like CT, ultrasonography, and emerging techniques in prostate care.


Methods: The review synthesizes information from current literature on various imaging modalities used in prostate evaluation. The role of each technique in diagnosing benign and malignant prostate conditions, particularly prostate cancer, is discussed. The accuracy, limitations, and benefits of CT, MRI, and ultrasonography are compared, along with their relevance to clinical practice.


Results: MRI, especially multiparametric MRI, has shown superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting prostate cancer, even in low-grade cases, reducing unnecessary biopsies. While CT is useful in staging and evaluating metastases, it has limitations in detailing prostate anatomy. Ultrasonography remains a vital tool for biopsy guidance and assessing BPH. Each modality's application is tailored based on patient conditions, such as prostate volume, inflammation, or malignancy suspicion.


Conclusion: MRI stands out as the most advanced imaging modality for prostate evaluation due to its high resolution and ability to distinguish between different types of tissue. However, combining imaging techniques offers a comprehensive approach, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for conditions like BPH, prostatitis, and prostate cancer.


Article Details

Section
Articles